📅 10.12.25 ⏱️ Read time: 7 min
The vibe coding conversation has been dominated by solo founders. One person, a laptop, and a string of AI prompts resulting in a working SaaS in 72 hours. It's a compelling story — and it's true.
But most software gets built by teams. And the question teams are now asking is: does vibe coding work when multiple people have to coordinate, maintain a codebase, and ship together?
The answer is yes — but the approach needs to adapt.
Vibe coding for solo founders works because everything lives in one person's head. They know the data model, the user flows, the business logic, and the technical constraints. When AI tools generate code, that person can review it with full context.
In a team, context is distributed. Three people might be building three different features that need to interoperate. If each person is vibe coding independently — prompting AI to generate code without coordination — you end up with:
These aren't reasons to abandon vibe coding in teams. They're reasons to structure it deliberately.
The teams shipping fastest with vibe coding in 2025 have figured out a division of labor that works. Instead of everyone vibe coding everything, they divide ownership by domain — and vibe code within their domain.
This mirrors how software teams have always worked, just at a different abstraction level:
Within each domain, the vibe coding approach — describe intent, let AI handle implementation — works well. Across domains, the interface is an API: a clean contract that lets each layer evolve independently.
A team vibe coding stack in 2025 looks like this:
Owner: Frontend engineer or designer Tools: Lovable, v0.dev, Cursor, Webflow Interface: REST API calls to backend, design system components
The frontend vibe coder describes UI flows, components, and interactions. AI tools generate the React (or equivalent) code. The frontend engineer reviews for design consistency and accessibility, not implementation details.
Owner: Backend engineer Tools: Supabase, Xano, Cursor with AI assistance Interface: Database schema + REST API + auth rules
The backend vibe coder designs the data model by describing the entities and relationships. The platform generates tables, row-level security policies, and API endpoints. The engineer reviews for correctness of the schema and security of the access rules.
Owner: Data engineer or AI engineer Tools: Aicuflow Interface: REST API endpoints that return predictions or processed data
The data vibe coder describes the pipeline: what data comes in, what the model should predict, how the output should be structured. Aicuflow configures and trains the model. The engineer evaluates performance metrics and decides when the model is good enough.
Owner: DevOps or senior engineer Tools: Vercel, GitHub Actions, Terraform Interface: CI/CD pipelines, environment variables, monitoring dashboards
In a team vibe coding stack, the AI and data layer is often the biggest bottleneck — not because it's harder to vibe code, but because it's the layer that has traditionally required the most specialized expertise.
Before tools like Aicuflow, adding an AI feature to a product meant:
With Aicuflow, the data/AI domain engineer describes the pipeline, the platform handles the implementation, and the output is a REST API endpoint that the frontend and backend can consume immediately.
The workflow for a team:
Total time from feature definition to integrated prototype: two to three days. Same work in a traditional setup: two to three weeks.
→ See how the Aicuflow pipeline works → Learn how model deployment works
1. Define interfaces first, implement second. Before any vibe coding begins, agree on the API contracts between layers. What does the frontend expect from the backend? What does the backend expect from the AI endpoint? Once interfaces are defined, each domain can vibe code independently.
2. Own the evaluation, not the implementation. In vibe coding teams, the human's job is to evaluate the output — not to write it. Frontend engineers review for UX and accessibility. Data engineers review for model performance and fairness. Backend engineers review for correctness and security.
3. Document decisions, not code. AI-generated code changes fast and often. What stays stable is the reasoning behind decisions. Document why a particular model architecture was chosen, why certain features were included, why a specific API design was selected. The how can be regenerated; the why cannot.
4. Treat the canvas as the documentation. In Aicuflow, the pipeline canvas is also the documentation of the data and AI system. It shows every step, every node, and every connection. Keep it organized. It's what a new team member will look at first.
5. Review at the boundary, not inside the domain. Integration reviews — what crosses the boundary between frontend and backend, or between backend and AI — deserve careful attention. Within a domain, trust the vibe coding output and focus review energy on the interface.
The teams that make vibe coding work at scale share a mindset: they are systems thinkers who use AI to implement, not to design.
They spend their creative energy on:
Everything else — the boilerplate, the scaffolding, the implementation details — gets delegated to AI tools.
This is what vibe engineering looks like at the team level: not chaos, but structured intent-driven development, where every engineer is operating at a higher level of abstraction than before.
→ Read the full vibe engineering overview → See the 2025 LCNC toolkit for founders and teams
Search for a command to run...