📅 05.01.26 ⏱️ Read time: 8 min
Every product team is building an AI assistant. Most of them look the same: a chat interface on top of a general-purpose language model that confidently makes things up about your specific product, your proprietary data, or your internal processes.
The AI assistants that actually work are different. They're grounded in your data — and that requires more than a chat API call.
A general-purpose AI assistant — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini — is trained on the public internet. It knows a lot. But it doesn't know:
When a user asks your AI assistant a question that requires any of this knowledge, a general-purpose model will either hallucinate an answer or admit it doesn't know. Neither response is useful.
The gap between a generic AI assistant and a genuinely useful one is the gap between general knowledge and your specific knowledge. Closing that gap is the core engineering challenge.
Add your knowledge to the system prompt. Works for small, stable knowledge bases. Breaks down for anything larger than a few thousand tokens and fails completely for dynamic data.
Store your knowledge in a vector database. At query time, retrieve the most relevant chunks and include them in the context window. The model answers based on the retrieved context rather than its training data.
RAG works well for large document collections, internal knowledge bases, and cases where the answers are in your text. It does not work well for structured prediction tasks — classifying, forecasting, scoring.
Train a model specifically on your data to perform a specific task — classify, predict, recommend, detect. The model learns patterns from your historical data rather than retrieving answers from documents.
Custom models work well for structured prediction (churn, fraud, demand, quality) but are not a replacement for RAG when the task is question-answering over unstructured text.
Most sophisticated AI assistants use both: RAG for question-answering over documents, custom models for structured prediction tasks, with a language model orchestrating between them.
The OpenAI Assistants API provides a managed infrastructure layer for building AI assistants with persistent conversation state, tool use, and file handling — without building the orchestration yourself.
Key capabilities of the Assistants API:
Persistent threads: Conversations are stored as threads. Users can return to a conversation; the assistant remembers the context. This removes the need to manage conversation history in your own database.
File search (built-in RAG): Upload files to the assistant. The API automatically chunks, embeds, and stores them in a vector database. At query time, it retrieves relevant chunks and includes them in the context. This is a managed RAG implementation — useful for getting started quickly.
Code interpreter: The assistant can write and execute Python code to answer quantitative questions, generate charts, or process data files. Useful for data analysis assistants.
Function calling: Define functions (tools) that the assistant can call — your own APIs, database queries, external services. The assistant decides when to call which tool based on the user's query.
When the Assistants API is the right choice:
When you might need more control:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is the most common technique for grounding AI assistants in proprietary knowledge. The architecture:
RAG is powerful for:
RAG is not the right tool for:
For those tasks, custom trained models — deployed as APIs — are the right approach.
| Task | RAG | Custom Model |
|---|---|---|
| Answer questions from documents | ✅ Ideal | ❌ Not designed for this |
| Predict customer churn | ❌ Cannot predict | ✅ Classification model |
| Classify incoming support tickets | ⚠️ Possible but costly | ✅ Fast, cheap at inference |
| Explain a document section | ✅ Ideal | ❌ Not applicable |
| Detect anomalies in time-series data | ❌ Cannot detect | ✅ Anomaly detection model |
| Recommend products based on history | ❌ Cannot personalize at scale | ✅ Recommendation model |
The best AI assistants are hybrid: a language model handles conversation and document Q&A via RAG; custom models handle structured prediction tasks and serve their results through tool calls.
A complete data-grounded AI assistant typically has three components:
1. The conversation layer — a language model (via OpenAI Assistants API, direct API, or a framework like LangChain) that manages dialogue, decides what to retrieve or call, and synthesizes responses.
2. The retrieval layer — a RAG pipeline over your document corpus. In Aicuflow, the RAG pipeline node handles ingestion, embedding, and retrieval. The result is an API your conversation layer can call.
3. The prediction layer — custom models trained on your structured data, deployed as REST APIs. The conversation layer calls these for prediction tasks: "What's the churn risk for this customer?" → POST /predict → 0.73.
Together, the assistant can answer questions from documents ("What's our refund policy for enterprise customers?") and from model predictions ("Is this account at risk of churning?") in a single conversation.
→ See how to build a RAG pipeline in Aicuflow → Learn how custom model deployment works → Understand the AI concepts behind retrieval and prediction
Search for a command to run...